I'm guessing this is true or false. The answer is True
The financial elites that favor the "American" model -- deregulation, weak unions, and a minimalist welfare state -- ask the wrong question: how to compete against countries with lower wages and living standards.
Chief among the promised protections were that all people born in the colonies were granted the same rights of British citizens elsewhere in the world. James and the English government also promised to compensate and protect the colonists in case they were robbed
Hope it’s right...
This are the choices:
<span>Anti-Federalist arguing for immediate ratification of the Constitution with a strong national government
Anti-federalist arguing against ratification of the Constitution in favor of a weaker national government
a Federalist arguing for immediate ratification of the Constitution with a strong national government
Federalist arguing against ratification of the Constitution in favor of a weaker national gov
</span>
The answer is - Anti-federalist arguing against ratification of the Constitution in favor of a weaker national government
If you lived in suburbia chances are you could probably afford a car. By the 1950s farms weren't as much as a majority as they were back in the 1800s, so B is ruled out as well as A. Racism was still a pretty big thing in the '50s, and I believe that was when the "separate but equal" stuff was going on. So my best guess would be C) Many middle-class suburban women were unhappy with their circumstances.
