Answer:
D. maing informed decisions when voting
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Passed in response to the Boston Tea Party, the Coercive Acts sought to punish Massachusetts as a warning to other colonies. The Coercive Acts consisted of the Boston Port Act, the Massachusetts Government Act, the Administration of Justice Act, and the Quartering Act of 1774.
Answer:
increase in the population and rural to urban migration.
Explanation:
People migrate to towns and cities in hope of gaining a better standard of living. They are influenced by pull factors that attract them to urban life, and push factors that make them dissatisfied with rural living.
1)What contributed to the modernization of war in WWI?
Answer: <u>Germany's policy of unchecked submarine aggression against shipping interests headed to Great Britain helped bring the United States into World War I.</u>
2) What allowed for the mass production of weapons in WWI?
Answer: <u>Mass production permitted great increases in total production.</u><u> </u><u>Mass production allowed the evolution of consumerism by lowering the unit cost of many goods used.</u>
3) What did industrialization and modernization make it easier for both sides to do?
Answer: <u>is by undergoing the comprehensive transformation of industrialization that societies become modern. Modernization is a continuous and open-ended process.</u>
<u>4</u><u>)</u><u> </u><u>How many people were killed and wounded in WWI? </u>
<u>Answer</u><u>:</u><u> </u><u>The total number of military and civilian casualties in World War I, was around 40 million. </u>
5) What were both sides forced to do in order to avoid being killed and overtaken?
Answer: Both sides concentrated on breaking up enemy attacks and on protecting their own troops by digging deep into the ground.
6) What would the use of trenches in WWI lead to the designing and development of?
<u>Answer: During World War I, trench warfare was a defensive military tactic used extensively by both sides, allowing soldiers some protection from enemy fire but also hindering troops from readily advancing and thus prolonging the war.</u>
The correct answers are: the declaration of independence speaks of a divine creator and the declaration of the rights of man speaks of a supreme being. Both documents drew on the "natural law" philosophy of John Locke.
Indeed, the Declaration of independence explicitly mentions the Creator in the preamble:
“"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen mentions the Supreme being in its preamble as well:
“In consequence whereof, the National Assembly recognises and declares, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following Rights of Man and of the Citizen.”
Finally, although both documents draw on the natural law philosophy of John Locke, the American version is more traditional in that it considers that such rights are given to humans by a deity or transcendent being of the same kind while the French version is more secular.