Explanation:
I think it is possible for the nation to avoid a civil war.
Following things needed to do for minimizing civil war:
- rights of citizen must be fulfilled
- facilities should be given
- freedom should be given
- proper education should be given.
<span>It showed that differences such as North and South and Slavery and no slavery still existed in America and divided the states still. i am 100% sure of my answer and plz my answer brainliest</span>
Answer: James Abraham Garfield
Explanation:
James Abraham Garfield was the 20th President of the United States of America. He was the President from 4th of March 1881 to 19th of September 1881.
He was shot in his back at the Baltimore and Potomac station, by assassin Charles Guiteau on the 2nd of July 1881. Although he survived the initial shooting, he died after eleven weeks.
Answer:
In both the New England and Chesapeake regions, English colonists established settler colonies based on agriculture, in contrast to French trading posts in Canada. These settlements were based on some form of agriculture and had some measure of self-sufficiency, especially in New England. For example, permanent settlements were established at both Jamestown in the Chesapeake and Boston in Massachusetts Bay. The economies of the New England and Chesapeake colonies were very different. The New England colonies had a more diverse economy which included shipping, lumber, and export of food crops. On the other hand, the Chesapeake colonies' economy focused almost exclusively on the production and export of tobacco and a few other cash crops. This focus on cash crops fostered a need for slave labor in the Chesapeake. As a result, more enslaved Africans went to the Chesapeake than New England. The New England climate and terrain was not suitable for growing cash crops like tobacco. A plantation economy did not develop in New England because plantation crops would not grow. In the Chesapeake, however, the soil, weather, and flat terrain were excellent for tobacco growing. Had the climate of Virginia been more similar to Connecticut, it’s reasonable to say the two colonies would have been very similar. The sharp contrast in the climates and terrain accounts for much of the difference in the development of the two regions.
