The Berlin Blockade impact the Cold War because it <span>convinced the United States that it must stand firm against communist expansion. The answer to your question is C.
I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
</span>
I never reviewed this in class but I do remember that my teacher said that Rome had a strong army. I know its not B, C, and I don't think its D.
Hopefully this helped you.
They have a division of specialization. I'm pretty sure thats the answer.
Answer:Emperador romano es el término utilizado por los historiadores para referirse a los gobernantes del Imperio romano tras el final de la República romana.
En la Antigua Roma no existía el título de «emperador romano», sino que este título era más bien una abreviatura práctica para una complicada reunión de cargos y poderes. A pesar de la popularidad actual del título, el primero en ostentarlo realmente fue Miguel I Rangabé a principios del siglo IX, cuando se hizo llamar Basileus Rhomaion (‘emperador de los romanos’). Hay que tener en cuenta que en aquella época el significado de Basileus había cambiado de ‘soberano’ a ‘emperador’. Tampoco existía ningún título o rango análogo al título de emperador, sino que todos los títulos asociados tradicionalmente al emperador tenían su origen en la época republicana.
La discusión sobre los emperadores romanos está influenciada en gran medida por el punto de vista editorial de los historiadores. Los mismos romanos no compartían los modernos conceptos monárquicos de «imperio» y «emperador». Durante su existencia, el Imperio romano conservó todas las instituciones políticas y las tradiciones de la República romana, incluyendo el Senado y las asambleas.
En general, no se puede describir a los emperadores como gobernantes de iure. Oficialmente, el cargo de emperador era considerado como el «primero entre iguales» (primus inter pares), y muchos de ellos no llegaron a ser gobernantes de facto, sino que frecuentemente fueron simples testaferros de poderosos burócratas, funcionarios, mujeres y generales.
Explanation:
Answer: The government sought to justify its role in World War I. Various mechanisms were used to justify entering the war. The war had a strong resonance among American society.
Explanation:
- In addition to the mass recruitment of pups during World War I, the U.S. government also sought to influence the population on this occasion. Civilians were called upon to help the nation, and they could do so in many ways. One element of civilian support for the U.S. government was the purchase of war bonds. Civilians could also help with a donation to support U.S. troops. Many are invited to work in the war-based, dedicated industry.
- One of the mechanisms of support for the U.S. war effort was the conduct of certain economic activities, that is, the centralized control of product prices administered by the War Industry Committee. Attempts were made to maintain strict control over oil and food prices, thereby achieving certain economic benefits, to support U.S. troops' military action.
- During the war, the U.S. government sought to develop some military propaganda to justify the entry of the United States into the conflict among the population. The law and espionage were enacted in 1917, as well as an amendment to treason a year later, which sought to eliminate the anti-oppression mood.
- The war greatly affected American society. American troops numbered a large number of African-American soldiers. Their experiences, especially in returning from the battlefield, were extremely unpleasant. Many have experienced different types of racial segregation. The war also affected women. Many are called upon to support the united states in the war with their participation. As many men went to war, the factories were empty. Many women are thus employed in armaments and ammunition factories. And a large number of women were also engaged in battlefields as nurses and cooks
