Answer:
i really think B but not sure
Explanation:
It can be inferred here that the author insinuates that computers are getting better at what humans do especially translating languages. A counterclaim or assertion is posited where in the human, out of fear of redundance asserts "we're still good for something".
<h3>What is the textual evidence that indicates that the author is comparing computers and the ability of humans is?</h3>
Computer: A Computer Can Now Translate Languages as Well as a Human:”
Humans: “We’re still good for something”
<h3>What is textual Evidence?</h3>
The evidence from a text that supports the assertion made by that text is called textual evidence.
Textual evidence can also be used to buttress inferential claims.
Learn more about inference:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Rebeccas aunt that she hasn't seen in a long time was glad to see her after mr cobb dropped her off
The passage above highlights one of <em>The Open Boat</em>'s theme: Man's existence insignificance. The characters in the book often rant against fate, to cover for (the argument Crane's trying to make) the sense that in the end all there is, is nothingness.
It wouldn't be either of those. It would be is or was.
