The parity legislation basically sought to restore the terms of trade that was enjoyed by farmers beginning In the 1920s. This legislation was used by farmers to justify the prices of their agricultural produce. They compared this argument with the belief that farming needs to remain as profitable compared between the years of 1909 and 1914.
The appointment and confirmation of Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps set forth by the United States Constitution, which have been further refined and developed by decades of tradition. Candidates are nominated by the President of the United States and must face a series of hearings in which both the nominee and other witnesses make statements and answer questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which can vote to send the nomination to the full United States Senate.[1] Confirmation by the Senate allows the President to formally appoint the candidate to the court.[1] The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Justice, thus the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.
Senate cloture rules historically required a two-thirds affirmative vote to advance nominations to a vote; this was changed to a three-fifths supermajority in 1975. In November 2013, the then-Democratic Senate majority eliminated the filibuster for executive branch nominees and judicial nominees except for Supreme Court nominees by invoking the so-called nuclear option. In April 2017, the Republican Senate majority applied the nuclear option to Supreme Court nominations as well,[2] enabling the nominations of Trump nominees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to proceed to a vote.....
Hope this helps ;)
<span>the master plan as developed by Iark Kerr aimed at balancing what was called the competing demands of fostering excellence and guaranteeing educational access for all. The master plan achieved a number of objectives such as the benefit of creating a system of combined excellence with broadened access.
</span>
<span />
Wait sorry can you translate it to english pls
Answer:
The word sweet shows that the landscape is pleasing to the speaker of the poem.
Explanation:
From the poem which starts with "Five years have passed,...and again i hear these waters, rolling from their mountain-springs with a sweet inland murmur", it is clear that the author is admiring the landscape which remains the same after five years have passed with very little changing since then.
It is quite clear how the author feels seeing the mountain-springs and the water after such a long time and how they still look beautiful to him after such a time. The landscape is indeed beautiful to the author.
