Argumentos en contra de la intervención del gobierno.
Los gobiernos que pueden tomar decisiones equivocadas, influenciados por grupos de presión política, gastan en proyectos ineficientes que conducen a un resultado ineficiente.
Libertad personal. La intervención del gobierno está quitando la decisión de las personas sobre cómo gastar y actuar. La intervención económica quita cierta libertad personal.
El mercado es más eficiente para decidir cómo y cuándo producir.
Argumentos para la intervención del gobierno para mejorar la igualdad
En un mercado libre, tiende a haber desigualdad en ingresos, riqueza y oportunidades. La caridad privada tiende a ser parcial. La intervención del gobierno es necesaria para redistribuir los ingresos dentro de la sociedad.
es su opinión, así que debe elegir si el gobierno debe o no intervenir y luego
No hablo español, así que si hay algún error en el español, lo siento, hablo inglés, uso el traductor de Google
This question is not complete because it lacks the photograph showing the architectural or technological feature of the rural landscape
Find attached to this answer the photograph showing the architectural or technological feature of the rural landscape
Answer:
Windmill
Explanation:
The Windmill is a technological structure that was created to function using the power or speed of the wind.
The speed generated by the wind was used by the windmill for various purposes.
Those purposes includes:
a. Generation of electric power also known as electricity.
b. Pumping of water.
c. Milling of grains.
d. Generation of other sources of energy
A wind mill is made of fan or blade like structures that are called VANES. This vanes utilises the speed of the wind which cause them to rotate continuously at a very high speed and allows them to generate the energy required to mill grains, pump water or generate electricity.
Im sorry bud i dont even know what the question is
What? you are supposed to be using this for educational reasons
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
What was at stake between the competing candidates, especially Adams and Jackson was the reputation and legality of the United States election system.
We are talking about the controversial US election of 1824.
In this election, four candidates participated: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, and William Crawford. The election resulted very competitively, without a clear winner. In the end, Andrew Jackson won the popular vote. That is why the final result relied on the hands of the House of Representatives. Congress gave the final victory to Jhon Quincy Adams, and candidate Jackson accused the decision to be corrupted.
President Adams appointed Henry Clay as his Secretary of State and that made Andrew Jackson accuse this of a corruption action. The popular mane of this situation was known as the Corrupt Bargain.
