Answer:
Part A:
The cofounding variable is a factor that could cause a result on the experiment. This would be the people taking extra food.
Independent variable would be being asked to sign in or not and take free food, because independent variable is a variable that is changed or manipulated and in this case the people were split in half and the hypothesis is that the people who didn't sign in would take more food.
Operational definitions are important when conducting research because it defines all the variables in the experiment, so it can be replicated. The operational def for the dependent variable would be "Doing the right thing even though you aren't being watched"
Part B:
The data does not support the hypothesis because even the people who signed in could've taken extra food when the dean wasn't looking. The findings cannot be generalized to all students because some students could have been taught better and can differentiate between right and wrong. So the people who were not signed in could've just taken one burger and drink, and the people who were signed in might feel obligated to take more than one burger because they had signed in and didn't just come without signing in.
The study is not a naturalistic observation because the observer did not look at the people who took the food and which side took more food.
This sequence can be modeled by
, and that if n is even, the number becomes negative. So the seventh number would be 3^6, and that is 729, since 7 is odd.
Answer:
The author's point of view is reflected in this phrase; "..., in the near future, the United States using the pretext of an allegedly growing threat to the Western Hemisphere, will embark on a long process of increasing the pressure on governments of the Latin American countries to work out additional threats against Cuba."
Explanation:
The author's perspective is seen in his use of words like "pretext," and "allegedly". The author is thus saying that the United States is not straightforward, or completely honest in the claims of a threat to the Western Hemisphere. This phrase also shows that the author believes that the United States was being unnecessarily hard on the Cuban nation by threatening them.
We can sense that the author of the text favors Cuba as against the United States. In order to determine the author's perspective, careful attention ought to be given to certain key words in the text.
How does the decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803) allow the judicial branch to check the power of other branches?
It prevents the president from using executive orders.
It limits the terms in office that a president can serve at two.
It allows the judiciary to limit the
Water, wind, gravity, and ice because they wear away or break up rocks, sediments, and soil from the Earth's surface.
