Answer:
2.50t + 350 = 3t + 225
Step-by-step explanation:
Let t represent the number of tickets that each class needs to sell so that the total amount raised is the same for both classes.
One class is selling tickets for $2.50 each and has already raised $350. This means that the total amount that would be raised from selling t tickets is
2.5t + 350
The other class is selling tickets for $3.00 each and has already raised $225. This means that the total amount that would be raised from selling t tickets is
3t + 225
Therefore, for the total costs to be the same, the number of tickets would be
2.5t + 350 = 3t + 225
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
22/13 =1.69≈3.2
13/4 = 3.2
Answer:
0.2231 (22.31%)
Step-by-step explanation:
defining the event F = the marketing company is fired, then the probability of being fired is:
P(F)= probability that the advertising campaign is cancelled before lunch * probability that marking department is fired given that the advertising campaign was cancelled before lunch + probability that the advertising campaign is launched but cancelled early * probability that marking department is fired given that the advertising campaign is launched but cancelled early .... (for all the 4 posible scenarios where the marketing department is fired)
thus
P(F) =0.10 * 0.74 + 0.18 * 0.43 + 0.43 * 0.16 + 0.29*0.01 = 0.2231 (22.31%)
then the probability that the marketing department is fired is 0.2231 (22.31%)
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
It is an identity, proved below.
Step-by-step explanation:
I assume you want to prove the identity. There are several ways to prove the identity but here I will prove using one of method.
First, we have to know what cot and cosec are. They both are the reciprocal of sin (cosec) and tan (cot).

csc is mostly written which is cosec, first we have to write in 1/tan and 1/sin form.

Another identity is:

Therefore:

Now this is easier to prove because of same denominator, next step is to multiply 1 by sin^2x with denominator and numerator.

Another identity:

Therefore:

Hence proved, this is proof by using identity helping to find the specific identity.