The first answer should be correct, as none of the others make any sense.
I hope this answers your question..
The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.
In particular, the majority noted that the Texas law discriminated upon viewpoint, i.e., although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint.
Answer:
When evaluating a source, a student should ask him/herself "does the source cite other sources as evidence?"
Explanation:
By asking this question, students are able to find the accuracy of the source. Accuracy is one of the 6 main criteria for evaluating sources - authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, coverage, and appearance.
Answer:
A character I identify is Izuku Midoriya from Boku no Hero Acadamia
Explanation:
Something I like about this character is that they never give up no matter how bad things get. I identify them because they have a unique personality.
If this doesn't help I'm sorry
XD
