The major topics or social issues discussed in the book are peace, education, women's status, cultural belonging, and rights and freedom. Malala shares her personal experience relating to these topics, and demonstrates her position in these social issues.
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
How about:
Website...
Program...
Foundation...
Base...
Network...
Database...
System...
I looked this question up and found the complete version online. The research question is:
"Why do high school students no spend enough time doing physical activity every day?"
Answer:
The statement which is the best evaluation of the research question is:
A. It is too biased; this research question contains an opinion and cannot be answered through research.
Explanation:
The author of the research question states an opinion when he/she says that high school students do not spend enough time doing physical activity. We do not know if this is true, if it is a fact. Had the author stated the question is a different manner, perhaps even providing some data, then it may have had some factual validity. For example: "A new study shows that 95% of high school students only exercise once a week. What are the reasons behind that number?" That question would not be based on an opinion, but on a fact. It would be easier to come up with a research - an interview, for instance - that would actually find out the reasons why that happens.
