Although it can be persuasive, a logical fallacy is detrimental to an argument.
This fallacy consists in arguing that a conclusion is false because an argument given for it is bad. There are two main ways for an argument to be bad:
- At least one of the reasons given for the conclusion is bad―that is, false.
- The reasoning of the argument is bad, that is, the reasons given do not support the conclusion strongly enough to meet the burden of proof.
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, I added the missing explanations below.
<u>Quotation/Explanation:</u>
- <em>"But that's chicken and I've got a reputation to consider." </em>Meaning: <em>The fact is "Squeaky sees things in Raymond that other people don't."</em>
- <em>"I almost stop to watch my brother Raymond on his first run." </em>Meaning: What this quotation show is that <em>"Squeaky thinks kids are as important as adults".</em>
- <em>"People like to act like things come easy to them...Not me." </em>Meaning: His willingness to state his opinion despite been different shows that <em>"Squeaky values honesty."</em>
- <em>"He's got no right to call me Squeaky, if I can't call him Beanstalk." </em>Meaning: <em>It shows that "Squeaky pays more attention to people she respects."</em>
- <em>"Besides, there's just me and Gretchen standing there really." </em>Meaning:<em> It shows that "Squeaky cares what other girls think about her."</em>
I think the answer will be B
Answer:
a. Address the writing process and not the actual submitted work
Explanation:
There is no argument process in these sentences, he just talks about how difficult it was to write the paper.
There is no argumentation, the author does not expose his points of view or anything, that he, he does not adresses anything about the actual submitted work.
So the correct answer is:
a. Address the writing process and not the actual submitted work
Answer:
insects or bugs have very high nutritious value
Explanation:
