The statement which best articulates a non interventionist argument against American imperialism is ''American expansion exploits the people’s of other nations''
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The American rule over the other countries through ways like trade, religion or may be with the use of military forces was not liked by the people of those countries because it led to the deterioration of those economies and the exploitation of people of those countries.
Therefore people of those countries did not like it because it led to the exploitation of their resources, economy, financially and there was too much interference in the working of the government of those countries also.
Answer:
Supreme Court
Explanation:
In 1930, Franklin Roosevelt was elected as President of United States when country was suffering the crisis of Great depression. He was elected due to his promise to revive the economy of country by providing fiscal support to the banks and also follow the policies of expansion. However this type of economic reforms was not accepted by court and he always have to face lot of difficulties in passing these reforms and among this New Deal was most important.
Therefore Roosevelt with his political actions circumvent the power of Supreme court which was the main hurdle in his coarse of action. Moreover due to his stong leadership, United States manage to succed the biggest crisis of Great dipression by 1930s.
To make the Indians starve or move away
