Answer:
The reasons why military had to intervene in Pakistan was because the current government had administrative problems and had inadequate staff and resources, a huge refugee problem and poor infrastructure.
Explanation:
Since it was a newly formed state, Pakistan faced a lot of problems after the death of their leader. Few reasons why military had to intervene are listed below:
•Muslim league had incompetent people and administration failed to handle things.
•The states were in shambles. They had poor infrastructure.
•There was a huge refugee problem.
•The resources were limited.
•The states were conflicted.
Answer:
The U.S., technically
Explanation:
By every traditional measure, the United States “won” the Vietnam War. U.S. troops moved with impunity and held the field of battle after almost every engagement. Casualty rates were extremely lopsided in America's favor. Yet, by 1976, South Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia were communist. Which means that Vietnam won, if you will.
So I guess the U.S. won every battle and still lost the war. The war ended with a cease-fire rather than a peace treaty.
The positives were that you actually had a home and the negative was that you had a part of the military. another positive was that you had to chance to cultivate the downside was that you had to give a set amount of your harvested crops to your duke/duchess or whoever owns said land. I hope this will give you some pros and cons to feudalism
Answer:
No because the people of the US protested against the violence with the Viatnamese and protested that the military withdrawal their troops from there lands.
