Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.
Explanation:
the root is the part of the plant beneath the soil
Answer:
The textual evidence that best supports the inference that the Germans could not lay new cables in the waters of the English Channel is "The Germans now had to rely on radio transmissions from their powerful wireless station at Nauen, a few miles from Berlin."
Explanation:
a) Textual evidence is evidence found in the form of a quotation, paraphrased material, and descriptions of the text that supports an argument or thesis. Textual evidence support the thesis or main point.
b) An inference is a conclusion that is arrived at based on reasoning and evidence.
2.751 millions people as estimated in 2013....but for today we are not sure...hope this helps
Answer:
51.I will leave the party earl because i must study for my exam.
52.I late last night because i mustn't go to school on Sunday
53.We ought not to play football as it's raining outside
54.You mustn't to drive a car if you don't have a driving licence
55.If you want some useful advice ,you must have better talk to your parents about your probem.
Explanation: