Taking into account the statement above: "Look at this map of an imaginary state that has been redistricted.
Based on this map, what conclusion can someone draw about who was most likely in charge of the redistricting?
Party 1
Party 2
neither party"
The answer is: Party 1.
Hope this helps.
I doubt destroying machines is a good solution to the problem.
<span>Since the decision of the
Speaker of the House, John William McCormack, was to ask the high
chamber member Adam Clayton Powell Jr. not to take an oath, because of
the previous scandal in which Powell had been involved; If
the jury had decided in favor of Speaker McCormack, the way of operating
in the congress would have been questioned, since only one member could
be expelled according to what the constitution says, and not by the
decisions of the speaker. <span>The scope would have been very
large if it failed in McCormack's favor, giving a sense of illegality or
favoritism, and voters would feel that their representatives were not
respected.</span></span>
It was a. Charles Sumner who opposed the Dred Scott decision. He did this mainly on the grounds that he believed blacks had basic rights when it came to shin for their freedom in free states, which was the case for Scott.
Answer: 2.) Along the eastern coast
