NBT bank of america on Mohawk Street
Answer:
It is characteristic of CAPITAL goods that they are not used up in the short run. A society can choose to SACRIFICE some quality of life now BY PURCHASING fewer consumer goods ANS SAVING MONEY in order to build up its stock of capital goods. This will lead to a HIGHER QUALITY OF LIFE and more consumer goods PURCHASED AND CONSUMED later on.
Explanation:
A consumer can choose between saving and spending money, that is measured by the marginal propensity to consume or the marginal propensity to save. Money that is spent now, will provide a certain satisfaction in the present, but nothing in the future. Money saved will not provide a certain satisfaction in the present, but should provide much more satisfaction in the future since it should grow as time passes.
Answer:
The answers are,
For A. It's the revenue recognition principle in which revenue is recognised when it is earned, now when the cash is realized.
For B. Its the matching concept in which all expenses related with earnings are debited against it to find the profit or loss.
For C. It's full disclosure principle in which all events in material nature has to be disclosed. We can say that going concern effects this as well, as if any event affect the continuity of an entity, it has to be disclosed as well.
For D. It's the historical cost principle in which you account the assets and expenses at the price you paid for them. When the value increases over time, you can reevaluate and adjust it.
Explanation:
Answer:
Opportunity cost of holding the money = $1.650
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the value of the next best alternative sacrificed in favour of a decision.
The opportunity cost of holding the money is the interest on deposit that would be have been earned should it be invested at the savings rate.
Interest on savings deposit = interest rate × deposit
= 2.5%× 66,000= $1,650
Opportunity cost of holding the money = $1.650
Answer:
C) None of the $5,000 should be included in gross income.
Explanation:
During 2016, Sarah's itemized deductions (other than the stolen silverware) were only $2,000. If Sarah wanted to deduct the stolen silverware, she could have taken a casualty loss = $6,000 - $100 - $3,000 = $2,900. Her total itemized deductions would equal $2,000 + $2,900 = $4,900.
But during that year, Sarah should have opted for a standard deduction of $6,300 which is higher than her itemized deductions. That means that Sarah didn't claim any deduction for her silverware, so any money received from the insurance company should not be included in her gross income.
