Answer:
This seems like a writing prompt with no correct answer but ill give an example:
Explanation:
All families are not the same. One reason that families are not all the same is that not all families have the same amount of people. Some are larger or smaller, or may have more men then women or vice versa. Another reason that all families are not the same is that families have different traditions. Some families might observe cultures that are different then others or maybe none at all. Lastly, all families are not the same as people have different definitions of family. For some, family may be strictly those who relate by blood while for others family could be their pets or people who took them in.
Answer:
Upon failure by the owner of a vehicle to show evidence of financial responsibility, he is likely to receive a citation. However this citation can be dismissed by the court if the vehicle owner can provide a proof that there was a liability insurance policy in effect at the time he was issued the citation.
Explanation:
Welfare economics seeks to evaluate the costs and benefits of changes to the economy and guide public policy toward increasing the total good of society, using tools such as cost-benefit analysis and social welfare functions.
The thing which the authorized holder is <em>responsible </em>for determining at the time of creation of CUI material is:
- Whether information in a document or material falls into a CUI category.
According to the given question, we are asked to state the thing which the authorized holder is <em>responsible </em>for determining at the time of creation of CUI material.
As a result of this, we can see that there is an agency which is in charge of managing the CUI material in the federal government and this is called the <em>National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)</em> as they <em>manage </em>the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and the authorized holder <em>determines </em>whether the information in a document falls under the CUI category.
Read more about CUI material here:
brainly.com/question/17218068
Answer:
Accept H0
Explanation:
A group of psychologists was interested in knowing whether living environment had any effect on a student's grade point average (GPA). They took a set of twins and randomly assigned one sibling of the twins to live in an urban area and the other to live in a rural area After one year, they computed the GPAs for the twins and looked at the differences. Then they calculated the test statistic, and the P-value was found to be between 0.20 and 0.25. With a 0.05 level of significance, we should <u>accept</u> H0, and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that a difference exists between the mean GPAs of the two living environments.
A p value that is less than or equal to 0.05 suggest strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so you reject the null hypothesis. A p-value greater than 0.05 indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis, so you accept the null hypothesis. In this study, the null hypothesis will be "living environment has no effect on a student's grade point average (GPA)", and since the p value obtained from the study is greater than 0.05, we accept the null hypothesis.