Answer:He was both, of course.
Explanation:He made Rome into the Empire it probably needed to be to continue to exist; the endless civil wars of the decades previous had not truly weakened the Republic’s borders, but they had resulted in Rome splitting into factions and substates repeatedly, and eventually if left unchecked this would have likely become permanent: there would have been several “Roman” states all bickering over the corpse of the Republic. So Augustus stabilized that situation, and created a system that would last well enough to endure the later civil wars, if barely, and last for five centuries.
But he also ruled completely and while following the forms of the Republic left no substance to them. Further, he made people enjoy that he was doing it, coercing and co-opting them into buying in to his new system. A long reign and massive personal will made this possible, but resulted in the end of much of what Rome had built up over the Republic. The idea that the Senate and People ruled the Empire persisted as a concept, given lip service, but it never re-emerged, and this was due to Augustus.
Tyrant and visionary, savior and destroyer, he was all of those things and much more.
While in office, Roosevelt became a "trust buster<span>" by forcing then and signed </span><span>two new laws to protect consumers</span>
Answer:
The federalists wanted big government while the anti-federalists wanted a small government
Explanation:
While writing the Consitution, the Federalists wanted to give the Federal Governmet a lot of power so that they can prevent rebellions such as Shay's Rebellion from happening again. Plus, they believed that a strong central government was necessary to protect individual citizens rights and freedom as well as addressing the concerns of their big nation. On the other hand, Anti-Federalists did not want a big government because, they were afarid that the government will abuse its power and hurt states rights. Therefore, they supported a small government with strong state government rights.
Answer:
On the one hand, Gertrude still plays the role of the faithful queen, telling Claudius of Polonius' murder. She does not object to Hamlet's being sent to England, and she does not abide by Hamlet's request to stay away from the king
On the other hand, she does not report all of the details of her conversation with Hamlet, says he's weeping with remorse, and there is no evidence to suggest that she knows the fate that awaits her son in England.
Explanation:
