Answer:
D.) The speaker's paranoia becomes more pronounced.
Explanation:
Trust me, it's correct because I took the same test too.
Hope I helped!
A. It helps people understand what you're saying
Shakespeare's language, according to Johnson, is understandable. Shakespeare's characters are said to differ from one another in terms of how they use language.
Shakespeare is praised by Johnson, who says, "His theatre is the mirror of life." Johnson claims that because his plays are so realistic, we may learn useful information from them. The division of Shakespeare's plays into comedies and tragedies, in Johnson's view, is incorrect; he continues, "Shakespeare's plays are not in the rigorous and critical sense either tragedies or comedies, but compositions of a distinct kind." Eliot agrees that it is incorrect to categorize Shakespeare's dramas as tragic, comic, or historical. He believes that rational thought leads to moral thinking.
To know more about Shakespeare, refer to this link:
brainly.com/question/8912844
#SPJ4
Answer:
If Tim wants his readers to understand what makes Gerardo unique, the idea he should include is:
1. Gerardo speaks three languages.
Explanation:
We can find the correct answer through elimination. Options 2, 3, and 4 are not about characteristics that make Gerardo unique. Actually, they are about things Gerardo and Tim have in common, characteristics that they share. To indicate Gerardo's uniqueness, Tim must mention something different about him, something that distinguishes him from others, including from Tim himself. In that case, the best option is number 1. Gerardo's language skills are something that makes him unique, something that distinguishes him from most people.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Explanation:
Post hoc ergo propter hoc is a fallacy that refers to pseudocausality, that is, the situation that appears to be the result of causality between two events, although a closer examination of the situation would show that this is not the case.
That is, a correlation does not necessary imply causation, even if the connection may appear causal. Therefore, without a causal connection, cause and effect are arbitrarily assigned without a well-founded justification.
