Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
could you provide a picture and i can give you a step by step explanation
Answer:
no
Step-by-step explanation:
if it was a factor then, 2-3x = 0
x= 2/3
putting x = 2/3 in eqn,
(2/3)^2 - 2/3 +1 =7/9....so it is not a factor
Answer:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:
Where:
And we can find the intercept using this:
And the model obtained for this case is:

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.
And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:
For this case the value of r = -0.66
Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable
And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable
Answer:
Not Similer
Step-by-step explanation:
we can use the process of elimination, first AA isn't it because the corresponding angles arn't equal, next SSS itsn't it because we don't know the side lengths, and lastly SAS isn't it because we still don't know the side lengths.
Answer:
step 1: move the -4 to the right: x^2 -2x = 4
step 2: add 1 to each side: x^2 -2x + 1 = 4 + 1
step 3: factor the left side and simplify the right side: (x-1)^2 = 5
step 4: take the square root of each side: x - 1 = sqr root of 5
step 5: move the 1 to the other side:
and 