<span>A literary critic's analysis of the characters and their contrasts in the play. I would say this would be the best source since presumably the literary critic would be trained in Shakespeare's plays and would be used to writing analyses from long experience doing them whereas students would not have that much experience with his plays most likely.</span>
It is D, I think.
From Bud, Not Buddy, right?
Also, Bud made Todd pee his pants, right?
By pouring warm water on him?
The correct answer is:
- <em>It makes fun of human weaknesses through humorous characters. </em>
- <em>It exposes human flaws by exaggerating characters' weaknesses. </em>
- <em>It ridicules socially acceptable behavior by showing how characters' good intentions backfire. </em>
Explanation:
<em>Characterization is the way information about a character is delivered to the audience</em>, while <em>satire is a technique used to expose and criticize</em> through humor, iron, sarcasm and exaggeration. Characterization through satire helps the author show<u> the weaknesses, flaws and awkward behaviors</u> of a character in an entertaining way to the audience and change their perspective towards the character.
<span>Learning
a second language will expand one’s English vocabulary.TRUE Yes,
particularly if you learn something like French, Latin, or a Germanic
language. </span>
