Sampson, George, and Rameck should without problems have followed their formative years friends into drug dealing, gangs, and prison. Like their peers, they came from poor, single-discern houses in urban neighborhoods where survival, not scholastic fulfillment, was the priority. whilst the 3 boys met in a magnet excessive college in Newark, they identified every other as kindred sprits that wanted to overcome the notable odds against them and attain for opportunity.
They made a friendship p.c., figuring out collectively to take on the largest challenge of their lives: attending college and then clinical and dental schools. along the manner they made errors and confronted disappointments, but by operating difficult, locating the proper mentors, keeping apart themselves from bad influences, and supporting each other, they completed their desires–and greater.
In We Beat the street , The three doctors collaborated with award-triumphing YA author Sharon Draper to deliver their childhood, teenage, and younger-person anecdotes vividly to life. The short “conversations” with the doctors at the cease of every chapter provide context and recommendation in a pleasant, non-intrusive manner. younger readers can be captivated by the men’s sincere money owed of the road lifestyles that threatened to swallow them up, and how they helped every other be triumphant beyond their wildest desires.
Answer: 3 yellow
Explanation: 7-4=3
Hope this helps!!Brainlist?plz
Answer:
The sentence that say, "Only 30 seconds of fuel for landing equipment
Explanation:
Explanation:
One way to use slang and idioms in a story is to make characters feel more natural and funny. Unless a character is very formal, real people would not talk without slang or idioms.
The correct answer is C. The author of passage 1 believes fish farming is beneficial to the environment, while the author of Passage 2 believes fish farming is not the solution to overfishing
Explanation:
The two passages provide a different about fish farming, which is the practice that involves raising fish rather than capturing them in their natural habitat. In the case of the passage 1, the author proposes fish farming is beneficial because this stops the problem of overfishing, this can be seen in "Fish farming helps humans continue to consume fish while protecting valuable marine resources" that shows fish farming is the way to protect the environment and the populations of fish while benefitting humans.
On the opposite, the author of passage 2 exposes the negative effects of fish farming and in this way shows this is not a solution. This can be seen in "one of the major problems with fish farming is water supply contamination" or in "it also causes destructions to habits" that supports the idea fishing farming does not solve the problems caused by overfishing.
