Many of the Democrats, especially New Leftists supported this. Many Republicans did not like this act. There was political outrage.
There was a big crowd outside the Convention in protest of the Vietnam War. I don't think either party liked that. It didn't really change views, but protesters, police, and bystanders clashed.
Vietnam Protests were controversial. It affected the political views of people in different ways. The Democrats helped get the U.S. involved in the war and the Republicans also helped fuel it. Both parties' views were affected in different ways based on the individual and their beliefs.
<h3><em>Answer: The Missouri Compromise declared that an enslaved person gained his or her freedom upon entering a free state. In the famous Dred Scott Supreme Court case, Dred Scott was a slave who was brought into a free territory by his owner. After living there for an extended period of time and after his master passed away, Scott sued for his freedom. His argument relied on the fact that he was in a free territory and that this legally made him a free man. However, the Supreme Court justices ruled that slaves are not people. Rather, they are property and have no right to sue in court. This ruling essentially made slavery legal everywhere, delivering a huge blow to the abolitionist movement of the time.</em></h3><h3><em>I hope this helps love <3 (:</em></h3>
One big barrier is economic background. Many students from immigrant parents often can’t afford college or have to work instead of going to school. Another difference can be the language barriers given that it’s harder to learn English than it is most languages because it doesn’t stick to grammar rules as much as others do.
