<span>indirect characterization
This shows the character's feeling and ideals, which gives the reader a view of how the character thinks. The quote doesn't say anything directly about the character, but the reader can see how he feels about the Burmese (positively) versus the British (negatively but that he's not willing to show it.</span>
Answer:
What we can do is grow more flowers. It may not sound like much, but it can totally help. Bees' main job is to collect pollen from flowers so they can turn it into honey. If bees have no flowers to pollinate, then they either move from one place to another, or they can die. If we give them a good reason to stay, not only will it help them live, but it will also make us humans live better and healthier as well.
Explanation:
I really hope this helped you out! Have an amazing day! :)
Answer:
I'm going to say that the answer is either C or A
Explanation:
Because in the excerpt it looks like they had physically thrusted her on the stool, or it might have been figurative , so in that case it would be A. But I am pretty sure it is C.
Hope it helps :)
i dont know what is answer
Explanation:
carry study
Part A: B AquAdvantage salmon has DNA from other fish that lets it grow faster and in different conditions than regular Atlantic salmon.
The entire text talks about how these genetically modified salmon could be a better food source if it was approved by the FDA. One of the reasons is because it grows faster and in different conditions so it is easier farm.
Part B: C Paragraph 14
This paragraph supports part A because it specifies that the AquAdvantage salmon can grow to full size in half the time of Atlantic salmon.
3. D The FDA temporarily reversed its approval of transgenic salmon as food after listening to public concerns.
Originally the FDA, after extensive research, decided the genetically modified salmon was safe to eat and not harmful to the environment as long as it was farmed in facilities and not released in the wild. The text then goes on to say, "But so many people objected that the FDA decided to reconsider its decision." The other statements are simply incorrect.
4. C They show that people already eat genetically modified plant food without any issues or protest.
In the paragraphs, it explains that people in Canada are already eating some genetically modified food such as "tomatoes, corn, soya, canola, squash, milk products and other foods".