Answer:
False.
Explanation:
<em>Proving</em> a claim is what evidence does.
Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.
Explanation:
In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.
Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.
This new adhesive were someday used for store-bought tapes, it could help the environment in more than one way. Lignin is a waste from making paper and ethanol from trees. So this glue wouldn't just replace adhesives made from crude oil. It also would
The mainstream media gets influenced by many sources and does not have their opinions, while independent media works free from any influence or donations.
<h3>What are mainstream and independent media?</h3>
The mainstream media is the dependent type of media where the content to be released and broadcasted is influenced by many personalities, politics, and the choice of the audiences. They receive donations and money from the governments and the business.
The independent type of media does not work under the influence of any business, politics, or person. They do not receive any funds and work as a free organization. Their broadcasts are not affected by any influence and generally showcase reality.
Learn more about mainstream and independent media here:
brainly.com/question/10672640
#SPJ1
Answer:
the answer is to this is 'but'
