Answer:
No theocracies are true democracies. no secular government are theocracies. Thus, some secular government are true democracies.
d. deductive invalid
Explanation:
- The given statement is deductive as well as invalid.
- Such a process of logic in which we use the logic of two or more statements to get a final logical conclusion is known as deductive logic.
- In the given situation, we have concluded that some secular governments are true democracies on the basis of no theocracies are true democracies and no secular government are theocracies.
- So although, it is deductive logic but it is invalid as well.
They were both settled by English settlers
they were both horrible locations for planting
many people died in both places the first winter
they both had no idea about Indians
The NY Herald means the government would "Westernize" it. Mexico is not like the US or Canada in their culture or beliefs, intervention from US government or citizens would definitely change that.
Answer:
The argument uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.
Explanation:
The claim that a principality created by the people is easier to govern is a conclusion of deductive thinking, where the author has used evidence to substantiate that claim. These evidences must have been taken from historical facts, which prove that the conclusion is correct. In other words, we can say that to generate this claim, the author used an argument that uses deductive reasoning and logical evidence in the form of a historical example to support the claim.
