Depending on if you're asking if this is true or false then it is highly false because of the changes in society and what an individual believes is in their own definition a family. Families aren't always the mother and father and their children-over the years families have evolved as society has changed. Families have gone from a two parent household to a single parent household when either the father or mother can be the superior figure of the house. (Hope this helps some ^^)
The development of a two-party system did not result from <em>A. the selection of presidential candidates from "the Virginia Dynasty."</em>
The two-party system, which started with the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, continued to develop until during the controversial presidential election of 1824 between John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson.
The two-party system developed over concerns over the <em>abolition of slavery, voting of virtuous candidates, and the financial crisis of 1819.</em>
Thus, the <em>selection of presidential candidates from "the Virginia Dynasty" </em>did not develop the two-party system in the US.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/22145566
Everything was formed around the king/lord.The king owned the land.The serfs would trade services for housing and safety.Serfs/Peasants were at the bottom of the "Pyramid"it then it was the Knights,Nobles then King at the very top.
The correct statement is " opposition to the policies of the federal government."
The antiwar movement of the 1960's and 70's was sparked by the federal governments investment in the Vietnam War. There were many different actions that citizens did not agree with, including the use of Agent Orange, the military draft, and the invasion of Cambodia. Hundreds of thousands of citizens protested across the country about these policies.
The red movement was based around Native Americans fighting to get land back that was taken by the federal government. The federal government had a long history or shady deals and forcing Native Americans to move to reservations. In this movement, Native Americans purposely broke federal laws as a means of protest, showing their opposition to this branch of government.
