TRUE
<u>Explanation:</u>
The correct answer is true as the independent projects are selected based on the net present worth and the rate of return and do nothing alternative. In the independent projects, there is no need for the incremental B/C analysis. Simple B/C ratio will do it. If the B/C > 1, benefits outweigh the costs and the project is selected provided that there is no budget limitation. Thus, the given statement is absolutely the true one.
Answer:
$0 Gain or Loss
Explanation:
Given that,
Original cost of the equipment = $100,000
Accumulated depreciation on the equipment = $40,000
Book value of the equipment:
= Original cost of the equipment - Accumulated depreciation on the equipment
= $100,000 - $40,000
= $60,000
Gain/Loss = Sale value - Book value of the equipment
= $60,000 - $60,000
= $0
Therefore, the company should recognize a $0 Gain or Loss.
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": product of an extra worker is less than the previous worker's marginal product.
Explanation:
The Law of Diminishing Marginal Productivity indicates that increasing one variable while holding others the same can initially increase output but eventually adding more of that variable results in lower return rates. This law helps explain that it is not always the best way to increase income by increasing production.
<em>Initially, companies recruiting additional workers would boost production until too few machines or not enough space is sufficient to accommodate everyone. Then, the production rate will decrease.</em>
