9/11 had this impact on Farah and her mother as the terrorist attack created a distrust for those of different nationalities. Because people of the same religion as Farah (obviously in an extremist form) was the cause of thousands of deaths, many began to assume that anyone of the same religion and race would hold the same values, and, because of their relation of the terrorists alone, many unfairly assumed Farah and her mother were to blame.
(B) Analogy
i had to add more just ignore the rest of this lol
have a nice day :)
<span>any of very many chlorine substituted organic compounds, many of which are insecticides etc.</span>
Answer: Basically Jordan’s date is flinging himself on her. If he were leeching off of her, he would be there just to take advantage of the party. Although he knows she will sooner or later dump him for someone better, he does not let it bother him.
Explanation:
Answer:
Feldman reaches the conclusion that most people are honest without receiving an incentive by
studying a counterclaim about morality and arriving at a broad generalization.
Explanation:
A researcher can reach a conclusion that most people are honest after studying a counterclaim about morality. He can then arrive at a broad generalization.
A counterclaim is the opposite of an argument, or simply, the opposing argument. A counterclaim research is one undertaken to establish that the opposite of a research situation prevails. It is a claim made against a situation or an established position in order to rebut the claimed position.
In this instance, Glaucon had taken a position that no man could resist the temptation of evil if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated. For Feldman to contradict this claim, with a conclusion that 87% of the time, a man could resist the temptation of evil even if he knew his acts could not be witnessed or dictated because he had become invisible, it means that he had researched the counterclaim.
