Here you go!
1) Checks and Balances- This idea is implemented in the Constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. For example, the legislative branch(Congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (President). If the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. Vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. This check on power ensures that Congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.
2) Anti-Federalists do not want to ratify the Constitution unless it includes a Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalists are worried that the Constitution gives too much power to the federal government. Having a strong central government caused problems when the US was still part of Great Britain. This is why the Anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.
3) Federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix America's weak political structure. Before the US Constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the Articles of Confederation. This constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.
When farmers find there land and start a certain type of tradition it is very aggravating when someone try’s to change it for it could ruin their source of income this may ruin the relationship that the federal government and that farmer may have had
Answer:
high wages
Explanation:
the birth of communism is becauyse of this flaw people belived that the 1% the owners made all the money at the expense of the workers hope this helps god bless
The veto power of the president under the U.S. Constitution best reflects the principle of "checks and balances," or a "balance of power," since this stops the Congress from becoming too powerful.
Answer:
Miranda vs Arizona: Miranda rights were added to the 5th amendment, which is the constitutional requirement for any law enforcement to read your Miranda rights to you. "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you."
DC vs Heller: Landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
Marbury vs Madison: Established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.
