Well, with the equation in that form, it may not be obvious how to graph it.
So let's change just the form a little bit... without changing the equation:
<u> y - 5 = 0</u>
Add 5 to each side: <em>y = 5 </em>
Look at that for awhile, and think about what it tells us.
It says that 'y' doesn't depend on 'x' at all. No matter how far left or right
you go on the graph, the y-value of <em>every point</em> is 5 .
The graph is a horizontal line across the graph. It cuts across the y-axis at
the point where y=5 , and it stays exactly at that same height everywhere.
I think that the first part is true but the second is wrong because a number and its opposite will have the same absolute value. For example, the 5 is the absolute value of 5 and -5. This works with all numbers and their opposites. Since the number 0 doesn't have an opposite value, I think that 0, as an absolute value, only represents 0.
Hope this helps :P
9514 1404 393
Answer:
b, d, c, a, e
Step-by-step explanation:
A formula should always come with a definition of the variables it uses. Here, you're supposed to somehow magically figure out what the variables are.
A = P(1 +r/n)^(nt)
A is the amount of the investment of principal P after t years, compounding annual rate r n times per year.
__
Then your blanks get filled like this:
1. A -- b the value
2. P -- d the principal
3. r -- c the annual interest rate
4. n -- a number of times compounded per year
5. t -- e number of years
