The San Francisco Borad of Supervisors blame the Chinese for these living conditions. They argue that it is as if the Chinese community existed in open defiance of the law and even say that they are stronger against the law than other races.
I do not agree with their assessment because it is profoundly racist, attributing this conditions to some racial essentialism and campaigning for the banning of Chinese citizens in American soil. Instead of this, the San Francisco Board of supervisors should try to address the political and social factors that have led the Chinese communities to live in those conditions: being denied certain jobs other than cooks or housemaids, affordable housing outside of ghettoes and the financial stability to look after their families, communities and the improvement of their spaces in the city.
Hello there,
They were motivated to to defeat more land's as possible. That's what the Incan law's motivated Huayna Capac to do.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen
Answer:
The correct answer is B. As a result of the Supreme Court's ruling in Mapp v. Ohio, the court expanded the rights of the accused.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court ruling in Mapp v. Ohio in 1961 came to strengthen the rights of defendants in criminal cases in state courts. Thus, the Court established that the Fourth Amendment guarantee by which defendants have the right to protection against unreasonable searches and seizures (meaning by those searches carried out without a judicial order) was also applicable to the states, through the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In the case, Dollree Mapp had been convicted by the state of Ohio based on evidence obtained without the necessary search warrant, making the Supreme Court illegitimate all the evidence in the case.
The answer is C, the World Wildlife Fund!!
