The belief was that there was a distinct order of living things: Chinese, barbarians, and beasts. That's why they made all foreign diplomats bow down to the Emperor and why they completely isolated the country to show that it's self sufficient.
The answer is D.
The best statement, how the structure of the excerpt, are similar, is each relates an anecdote to appeal to the reader’s emotions.
<h3>What is “First Generation”?</h3>
The first generation is the ancestor generation, which can be taken from a specific time. The generations are the different time period for human beings, and can be of things.
Thus, the correct option is A, Each relates an anecdote to appeal to the reader’s emotions.
Learn more about “First Generation”
brainly.com/question/12841996
#SPJ1
It seems that the BJP government’s decision to illegalise the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets has its roots in a PIL that quotes the five-yearly Gadhimai festival in Nepal, where thousands of buffaloes are taken from India to be sacrificed to ‘appease’ Gadhimai, the goddess of power.
The contradictions that emerge from cattle – here encompassing all bovines – slaughter rules in Nepal perplex many: despite being predominantly Hindu, animal sacrifice continues to be practised. Cow slaughter is explicitly prohibited even in Nepal’s new constitution since it is the national animal, yet the ritual sacrifice of buffaloes and the consumption of their meat is not frowned upon. There is also, in marked contrast to the Indian government’s blanket approach to cattle terminology, a lucid distinction between cows (both the male and female) and other ‘cattle’ species (such as buffaloes and yaks).
The emergence of this contradictory, often paradoxical, approach to cattle slaughter in Nepal is the result of a careful balancing act by the rulers of modern Nepal. The Shah dynasty and the Rana prime ministers often found themselves at a crossroads to explicitly define the rules of cattle slaughter. As rulers of a perceived ‘asal Hindu-sthan’, their dharma bound them to protect the cow – the House of Gorkha borrows its name from the Sanskrit ‘gou-raksha’ – but as they expanded into an empire, their stringent Brahminic rules came into conflict with des-dharma, or existing local customs, where cattle-killing was a norm. What followed was an intentionally ambiguous approach to cattle slaughter, an exercise in social realpolitik.
The type of conflict experienced by Kyle in the passage given above is CHARACTER VERSUS SOCIETY, thus, the correct option is C.
Characters versus society conflict is said to occur when a person hold a particular belief concerning an issue but the community in which the person finds himself disagrees with his belief, therefore, the person will have to make decision as per which side to take.
Answer:
Is this suppose to be a riddle ?
