I know the three smallest. - Black Arrow, Lambda 4S, and Vanguard. Hope it helps!
Because it made people shorter, weaker and changed nature. People stopped getting a nutritious diet because they kept eating the same food. While hunters and gatherers would have meat, fruit, vegetables and grain
Answer:
1. the writer has limitations because they can only write about the chesapeake colonies and the new england colonies, not about anything else that doesn't tie in with those two colonies. the writer can make choices about how to answer the questions and how to word them to make them sound well written.
2. you will need to think about the historical causation, appropriate use of relevant historical evidence and more that are required by the prompt. without these you wont know how to answer the question. the essay must include the intro, body, and the conclusion to receive a full score.
3. option a would not be an acceptable thesis for the prompt. it is not an acceptable thesis because it doesn't give more detail about what you are talking about. your thesis should be specific, it should only cover what you will discuss in your paper. option a was not specific, so it could of talked about anything including those two colonies.
4. the new england colonies had thin rocky soil with fast moving rivers with a more diverse economy that included shipping luber, and exports of food and crops. the chesapeake colonies had better soil that the new england colonies,and a longer growing season. the chesapeake colonies had a much more higher priority on the production of tobacco and other cash crops. since they lived in different regions they had different production needs. they were both settled for religious freedom but they had their differences. both colonies did disturb the american indians by taking away their land to settle, which lead to conflict. i've met all of the requirements because i answered the question fully.
5. to provide evidence you must include facts about what you are writing about. they must be true to be considered evidence. you could also use sources to add information. this excerpt did a good job at using evidence. they used lots of facts regarding the two colonies. (not sure about this one)
6. you could provide historical context by first adding some background about what your going to add. then you could state your historical context that you are going to add, and then explain what you just added. you could add the historical context in the body paragraphs when trying to prove or solve something to the reader.
Explanation:
i hope this helps everyone. goodluck!!!
Somewhat fair. Not really from the different POV from now and then. But from the people of pasts understanding they may have thought what we do now was wrong. But I think some things we have done in the past has made America what it is today. There is not much judgement from it because there’s not much we can do to change the pay
Explanation:(a) Was this an observational study or an experiment? Explain your reasoning. Experiment, because certain variables were controlled (he sets the screen brightness to low and then starts a movie) to determine if iPhones last longer if the screen brightness is set to low, and it proves the cause and effect relationship.
(b) What is the explanatory variable and the response variable? Response Variable- To determine if iPhones last longer if the screen brightness is set to low Explanatory variable- he sets the screen brightness of 10 of the iPhones to high and starts a movie, then the other 10 to low and starts a movie.
(c) Was a random sample used to collect the data? Yes- “he selects a random sample of 20 brand new iPhones”
