Answer: A. Fewer new businesses were started in 2010 than in other years
Explanation:
Answer:
The existing state of American economy must be declared earlier respondent the interrogation.
The U.S. financial position is vigorous in 2017.The value rate is in its perfect vary i.e., 2.4 (2-3%).Joblessness is at its ordinary proportion and there isn't an excessive amount of rise or decrease. Conversely, the value is predicted to descent to a pair of 2.1% in 2018 and 2.0 in 2019. Drop in value would cause decrease in GDP and growth in state.
To avoid this drop I will be able to inscribe to manager of Federal Reserve Bank to cut back the rate (expansionary financial policy).Federal reserve will try this by shopping for bonds. Once Federal Reserve purchases bonds the money offer increases and rate decreases. As rate decreases mixture demand and financial gain increases. With escalation in financial gain and mixture demand the value wouldn't decrease in 2018 and 2019.
I would not recommend an expansionary economic policy as a result of it increases the rate yet and thus results in situation out.
Answer:
Answer is option b, i.e. purchase of natural gas by U.S. households.
Explanation:
Consumption component of U.S. GDP includes purchase of various durable goods, non-durable goods, and also various intangible services. But anything that is purchased as a means of investment rather than for personal consumption is not regarded as consumption component in GDP. Here, purchase of newly constructed houses is an asset and thus, is not included in these components. Similarly, purchase made for business purposes is also excluded from the list of consumption components.
Answer:
D. Qualified for the Position
Explanation:
Prima Facie Evidence
Prima Facie evidence is evidence that is sufficient to establish a fact or prove a proposition unless otherwise refutted.
Age Discriminationi in Employment Act
The age discrimination in Employment Act in the US was established as a labour law in 1967 and it was established to ensure that anyone who is at least 40 years of age does not suffer from employment discrimination.
The fact that Sharon is a forty-five year-old employee means she is qualified to file a suit against her employers under the Act. However, as previously stated before it can be established whether she deserves a higher pay or more dependable than her replacement or was discriminated against because of age, Sharon will need to establish the fact that she's qualified for the position taken away from her.
If she cannot prove that proposition or it ends up being refutted by the organisation, then the Age Discrimination in Employment Act cannot be invoked.
