All categories

2 years ago

What is the difference between low-relief and high-relief? Question 1 options:

Arts

2 answers:

Lelechka [254]2 years ago

6 0

♡ The Question/Task(s)! ♡

✦ || What is the difference between low-relief and high-relief?

︶꒦︶꒷︶︶ʚ♡ɞ︶︶꒷︶꒦︶

♡ The Answer(s)! ♡

✦ || The answer is, "Low relief: Does not stick out far from the surface,

High-relief: Extends far from the surface but is not "in-the-round"!

I apologize in advance if the answer is incorrect! ♡

︶꒦︶꒷︶︶ʚ♡ɞ︶︶꒷︶꒦︶

♡ The Explanation(s)/Step-By-Step! ♡

✦ || The low relief sculptures could appear blended in with the surroundings, as for the high relief sculptures, their contrast, colours, and angles, appear farther away from the sculpture!

︶꒦︶꒷︶︶ʚ♡ɞ︶︶꒷︶꒦︶

♡ Tip(s)! ♡

✦ || No Tips Provided!ヽ(>∀<☆)ノ

insens350 [35]2 years ago

5 0

Low relief isn’t as intense as high relief and so creates a calmer aura, one that isn’t panicked nor angry in a way.

in terms of sculpture, low reliefs- many reliefs made but only slight, more so smoothing deviations
high reliefs- many reliefs made but drastic changes to what you began with

You might be interested in

The shift from painting "what one sees" to a painting of "what one thinks about what one sees" describes what? Group of answer c

Musya8 [376]

Answer:

Shift from optical-art to construct-painting

Explanation:

The shift from painting "what one sees" to a painting of "what one thinks about what one sees" describes shift from optical-art to construct-painting.

7 0

3 years ago

Listen to mafuyu's song <3

Flauer [41]

Answer:

Sure, lol.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

true or false: one of the reasons for the lack of Indian unity in fighting Euroupeans was, that the Indians were descended from

Anton [14]

True. It is correct.

6 0

3 years ago

Miriam Schapiro is known for

laiz [17]

Is this a question or

5 0

3 years ago

Question 3

Mila [183]

Answer:

Based on this sculpture alone, we can assume Romans would be influenced by Greek art and sculptures. We can observe they valued realism and presented their rulers in an authentic light. They put lots of thought into the art and wanted to master it into perfection.

Explanation:

If we would assume things about Roman art only based on this piece, we could, first of all, see the art was influenced by Greek art. We can also determine that Romans included sculpturing into the art. They likely presented their leaders and rulers with the free-standing bust statues. Thes statues would be made of marble, judging by this one.

They wanted to present people realistically with their art. We can see that on this piece (bust of Julius Caesar) who is presented as a realistic middle-aged man – we see wrinkles on his face, around the mouth, on the forehead, as well as on his neck. They would put many details into the sculpture, which we can see in the way these wrinkles are portrayed, and in the small curves on the ears and nose. Romans valued authenticity and naturalness, but at the same time, they would portray people as being serious and determined, like this bust was. Therefore, we can conclude the Romans took art seriously and mastered it to perfection.

8 0

3 years ago