It was because they were inspired by the renewed interest in Greek and Roman culture.
Answer:
The biggest principle that the allies wanted to clean up after Napoleon was legitimacy.
Explanation:
Napoleon was a legitimate, recognized head of state, who everyone except England was allied with at one time or another. As a foreigner, they couldn’t execute the French head of state for acting on behalf of France. To just declare him a criminal and shoot him would have been admitting that the Czar of Russia and Emperor of Austria had been making deals with a criminal.
Also, some of the allies LIKED changes made by Napoleon and wanted to keep it. For example, Kings of the Confederation of the Rhine wanted to keep being Kings, not Grand Dukes or Electors. It was in their interest to not declare Napoleon an outright criminal.
Even the allies holding him on St. Helena wasn’t backed by law. How they were treating Napoleon had no legal precedence. They were making things up as they were going along. The reason why the British would never allow Napoleon to set foot on England was that Napoleon’s supporters would have filed a Habeas Corpus suit on behalf of Napoleon and make the British courts answer what law they were holding Napoleon under.
In the long run it actually played to the advantage of British that Napoleon was alive and under their control. Letting loose Napoleon was the ultimate political trump card they had against the Germans and the French.
Answer:
that is more people moving to where there is no one liveing
there are being bult new not from old frameing
because the people are use to living where there is no one living it is queit
Explanation:
Answer
Some Southerners rejected Sherman’s plan to give land to former slaves because some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution
Explanation
The confiscation strategy by Sherman was aiming to acquire land to facilitate the settlement of African-Americans received critics from some of the southerners who explained it as unconstitutional. The argument was that the constitution by then did not allow people to practice confiscation of private property.
