Northern: No slaves, mostly republican (our democrat) ideas, economy was based on trade and business
Southern: Slavery was supported, mostly (our idea of) republican, their economy was based on plantations and slaves
Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong or missed something. :)
Answer:
Employment agencies, career fairs, and Internet ads can all be sources of
d) job leads
Explanation:
Answer:
B. It gave Spain an advantage in exploration
Explanation:
This is the reason why Spain's ownership of the world's largest overseas holdings was important. The fact that Spain owned so much territory in different regions of the world meant that Spain had a lot more territory to explore. It also means that they were more likely to come across a large number of resources that would increase their wealth.
Answer:
The British government did not have the same interests as the colonists
Explanation:
During the later European wars of the 1700s, tensions between the British Empire, and the American Colonies grew. The British were interested in maintaining control over the colonies in order to extract resources from them via taxation.
The American Colonies were interested in keeping the great degree of indendependence that they were accustomed to, and were demanding no taxation without representation.
This tensions gradually grew over time and finally led to the American Revolutionary War.
Answer:
The Schenck v. United States trial - case-law on the possibility of limiting fundamental freedoms in wartime, 1919
Explanation:
In the Supreme Court’s decision, written by Judge Oliver Holmes, the Doctrine of Clear and Present Danger Rule was first articulated, according to which the US Congress has the right to restrict freedom of speech in cases where, in its opinion, citizens' statements constitute a “clearly existing danger” and may lead to serious negative consequences. The decision also indicated that restrictions on freedom of speech may be introduced during times of war and emergency, and this does not violate the First Amendment to the US Constitution. The court upheld the lower court’s verdict for inciting rebellion to Socialist Party activist Charles T. Schenck, who distributed materials calling for resistance to military service.
