Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
Answer:
Option D Research, discussion paper, exposure draft, standard.
Explanation:
The reason is that the International Accounting Standard Board conducts the research which includes the issues arising in the current standard due to advancement in environment. This requires that the company consider all the valuable suggestions fromt the professionals around the world. After a great discussion, the IASB chooses the best recommendations and publishes exposure draft which to review the judgement made. After careful review of the exposure, IASB issues new international accounting standard which results in abandoning the application of previous international accounting standard in two years time and opting to the new international accounting standard.
Answer:
June 1 2020
No entry
September 1, 2020
Dr Cash $1,980
Dr Accounts receivable $300
Cr Sales revenue $1,730
Cr Unearned sales revenue $550
September 1, 2020
Dr Cost of goods sold $1,140
Cr Inventory $1,140
October 15 2020
Dr Cash $300
Dr Unearned service revenue $550
Cr Accounts receivable $300
Cr Service Revenue $550
Explanation:
Preparation of the journal entries for Geraths in 2020
June 1 2020
No entry
September 1, 2020
Dr Cash $1,980
Dr Accounts receivable $300
($1,730+$550+$1,980)
Cr Sales revenue $1,730
($1,980/$2,610*$2,280)
($1,980+$630=$2,610)
Cr Unearned sales revenue $550 ($630/$2,610*$2,280)
September 1, 2020
Dr Cost of goods sold $1,140
Cr Inventory $1,140
October 15 2020
Dr Cash $300
Dr Unearned service revenue $550
Cr Accounts receivable $300
Cr Service Revenue $550
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
Product differentiation is a competitive strategy that aims to make the consumer perceive the good or service offered by a company differently from those of the competition.
The cost leadership strategy is to find and maintain a low cost position compared to the competition, this will allow the company to obtain higher returns than the industry average.
There is a relationship between the cost leadership strategy and the possession of a high market share, this is because having a high market share allows the appearance of economies of scale and economies of experience, both contribute to reducing unit costs.
Answer:
Short-run is a time limit during which at least one input can be fixed and other input quantities can be verified.
The long run is a time period in which all the inputs can be verified in quantities.
Explanation:
- Both the fixed and variable costs occur in the short term.
- There are no fixed costs in the long term.
- The combination of the output of a company results in the desired amount of the goods at the lowest possible cost is sustained by efficient long-term costs.
- The output changes variable costs. For instance, the employee's salaries and raw material costs are variable costs.
- Based on variable costs and the production rate, the short-run costs are increasing or falling. If a company manages its short-term costs well over time, the desired long-term costs and goals will more likely be achieved.
