1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
il63 [147K]
2 years ago
7

Was it reasonable for the government to limit Americans’ right to buy food? Write a short essay in which you develop your positi

on on this issue
History
1 answer:
Studentka2010 [4]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: The ubiquity on public college campuses of non-nutritious

meals and drinks, and messages selling their consumption, is of grave difficulty to many parents, teachers, administrators, and nutrients advocates. Schools undoubtedly

have an effect have an impact on how college students eat.1

By allowing

junk meals and soda businesses to saturate the college surroundings with their merchandise and messages, faculties can be

now no longer best undermining their efforts to educate college students about

appropriate nutrients however additionally fueling the American childhood

weight problems epidemic.2

Across the country, there's growing hobby in proscribing non-nutritious meals and beverage advertising and marketing on public

college campuses. A college district3

that desires to counteract

the pervasiveness of junk meals and soda producers at

college can be inhibited, however, now no longer best through financial and

political pressures however additionally through criminal questions associated with the

First Amendment.4

This paper seeks to demystify how the First Amendment

bears upon efforts to limit meals and beverage advertising and marketing

in public faculties. The paper starts with a short clarification of why the First Amendment is probably implicated in

a college district coverage to limit junk meals and soda advertising and marketing on college grounds. The paper then touches on two

movements a college district may take without regarding the

First Amendment: forbid the sale of non-nutritious merchandise without forbidding marketing and marketing for the merchandise; and

input into person contracts with carriers that proscribe

positive income and marketing and marketing practices.

Next, the paper describes the workings of a “discussion board analysis,” that's the criminal check that a courtroom docket might in all likelihood use

to assess a college district's marketing and marketing coverage this is challenged on First Amendment grounds. The paper determines

that there are 3 forms of marketing and marketing regulations that should English49 Words

Paraphrased Text

live on judicial overview below a discussion board analysis: (1) a ban on

all marketing and marketing on campus; (2) a ban on all meals and beverage marketing and marketing on campus; or (3) or a ban on marketing and marketing on campus for the one's foods and drinks that aren't allowed to be offered on campus.

You might be interested in
How do you think the court's brown ruling was received in the south
hichkok12 [17]
<span>The ruling was not received well in the south, and some of those vestiges still remain to this day. The end of segregated schooling, which had to be rectified "with all deliberate speed," took quite a while to occur. Even today, there are schools that, while they might not be segregated on a "de jure" basis, are still "de facto" separated based on racial characteristics.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following allows for the least amount of freedom for its citizens.
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

dictaorship

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the Continental Divide
Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

A continental divide is a boundary that separates a continent's river systems. Each river system feeds into a distinct ocean, bay, or sea. A continental divide is a naturally occurring boundary or ridge separating a continent's river systems this helps a lot with with each river system.

5 0
3 years ago
"during the years the articles of confederation were in force (1781–1789), there were no national courts and no national judicia
kkurt [141]
This excerpt explains why the Articles of Confederation needed to be fixed or replaced with a different constitution. The excerpt goes over several different flaws in the Articles of Confederation including:
1) No national courts to solve issues between individuals from different states.

2) No consistency in laws- In other words, states got to interpret the laws whatever way they wanted.

3) No way to enforce court rulings from state to state.

These weaknesses, plus others, resulted in the need for a new constitution. The US Constitution replaces the Articles of Confederation and is still what we follow today.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Stamp Act was a tax on what everyday item in the colonies?
xz_007 [3.2K]
....................................News papers
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What's the oldest Sanskrit literature
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Persian Empire fall into ruin and when?
    15·1 answer
  • What north vietnamese colonel received the unconditional surrender from the defeated south vietnamese regime on april 30,1975?
    5·1 answer
  • What aspect of the commercial revolution would bring discord between colonists and their mother countries?
    12·1 answer
  • From which of the following courts is there no appeal
    14·2 answers
  • Characteristics of a bad government in 3 ways
    5·1 answer
  • For which courts does the president get to appoint judges?
    15·1 answer
  • maraming bilang ng patalastas o iba pang elemento na hindi kasama sa mismong programa na sunod sunod na pinapatugtog a.mixing b.
    7·1 answer
  • Douglass quiz<br> (please help)
    12·2 answers
  • HURRY PLS AM TIMED I’LL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!