1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
il63 [147K]
2 years ago
7

Was it reasonable for the government to limit Americans’ right to buy food? Write a short essay in which you develop your positi

on on this issue
History
1 answer:
Studentka2010 [4]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: The ubiquity on public college campuses of non-nutritious

meals and drinks, and messages selling their consumption, is of grave difficulty to many parents, teachers, administrators, and nutrients advocates. Schools undoubtedly

have an effect have an impact on how college students eat.1

By allowing

junk meals and soda businesses to saturate the college surroundings with their merchandise and messages, faculties can be

now no longer best undermining their efforts to educate college students about

appropriate nutrients however additionally fueling the American childhood

weight problems epidemic.2

Across the country, there's growing hobby in proscribing non-nutritious meals and beverage advertising and marketing on public

college campuses. A college district3

that desires to counteract

the pervasiveness of junk meals and soda producers at

college can be inhibited, however, now no longer best through financial and

political pressures however additionally through criminal questions associated with the

First Amendment.4

This paper seeks to demystify how the First Amendment

bears upon efforts to limit meals and beverage advertising and marketing

in public faculties. The paper starts with a short clarification of why the First Amendment is probably implicated in

a college district coverage to limit junk meals and soda advertising and marketing on college grounds. The paper then touches on two

movements a college district may take without regarding the

First Amendment: forbid the sale of non-nutritious merchandise without forbidding marketing and marketing for the merchandise; and

input into person contracts with carriers that proscribe

positive income and marketing and marketing practices.

Next, the paper describes the workings of a “discussion board analysis,” that's the criminal check that a courtroom docket might in all likelihood use

to assess a college district's marketing and marketing coverage this is challenged on First Amendment grounds. The paper determines

that there are 3 forms of marketing and marketing regulations that should English49 Words

Paraphrased Text

live on judicial overview below a discussion board analysis: (1) a ban on

all marketing and marketing on campus; (2) a ban on all meals and beverage marketing and marketing on campus; or (3) or a ban on marketing and marketing on campus for the one's foods and drinks that aren't allowed to be offered on campus.

You might be interested in
What did the reformation and counter reformation cause the Catholic Church to do
Gnom [1K]

The Roman Catholic church convened the Council of Trent in November of 1544 in an attempt to counter the doctrines raised and supported by the Reformers.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The Council of Trent was the proper Roman Catholic answer to the doctrinal difficulties of the Protestant Reformation. It served to characterize Catholic convention and made clearing orders on self-change, assisting with reviving the Roman Catholic Church even with Protestant extension. The Reformation turned into the reason for the establishing of Protestantism, one of the three significant parts of Christianity. The Reformation prompted the reformulation of certain fundamental principles of Christian conviction and brought about the division of Western Christendom between Roman Catholicism and the new Protestant customs.

7 0
3 years ago
During the Reconstruction, Radical Republicans accused President Johnson of taking it too easy on the South. Johnson pardoned ma
iVinArrow [24]

In 1865 President Andrew Johnson actualized an arrangement of Reconstruction that gave the white South a free submit managing the change from subjection to opportunity and offered no job to blacks in the governmental issues of the South. The lead of the administrations he set up turned numerous Northerners against the president's arrangements. The end of the Civil War found the country without a settled Reconstruction approach. In May 1865, President Andrew Johnson offered an exculpate to every single white Southerner aside from Confederate pioneers and rich grower (albeit the greater part of these later gotten individual acquits), and approved them to make new governments.

Black people were denied any job all the while. Johnson additionally requested almost all the land in the hands of the administration came back to its prewar proprietors - dashing dark seeks after monetary self-sufficiency. At the start, most Northerners trusted Johnson's arrangement merited an opportunity to succeed. The course pursued by Southern state governments under Presidential Reconstruction, in any case, turned a large portion of the North against Johnson's strategy. Individuals from the old Southern first class, including numerous who had served in the Confederate government and armed force, came back to control. The new assemblies passed the Black Codes, extremely restricting the previous slaves' lawful rights and monetary choices in order to compel them to come back to the estates as needy workers. A few states constrained the occupations open to blacks. None enabled any blacks to cast a ballot or gave open assets to their instruction.

Johnson reasoning is exposed before as how important the new laws were to white leaders, and most radicals were against this. The main supporting argument is that Radicals of Lincoln's GOP wished severe reconstruction. They aforesaid the South was a defeated enemy. They demanded sturdy social control for all southerners WHO took half within the rebellion. These radicals had disliked Lincoln's plans for reconstruction. They felt he was too weak. Now, they hoped Johnson would share their concepts. They urged him to decide a session of Congress to pass robust legislation against the South. The radicals had reason to believe the new president united with them. He had known as the rebels traitors. He had demanded sturdy action against them once the war terminated.

Yet, Andrew Johnson shocked the radicals. He didn't call the exceptional session of Congress. Rather, he declared his own program for the southern states. Johnson pronounced an exculpate for every single previous confederate who guaranteed to help the Union and obey laws against bondage. At that point, he allowed previous authorities of the alliance to keep running for office in their states' new races. A considerable lot of these previous revolutionaries were chosen.  

The radicals additionally stressed over what might happen to as of late liberated slaves. They said the new state administrations of the South would not regard blacks as free and equivalent nationals. As confirmation, they indicated new laws the southern assemblies passed. The extreme Republicans chose that President Johnson's recreation program must be halted. They started attempting to gain the power of Congress to pass their own program. Just by increasing political power would they be able to rebuff the South and assurance full political rights to previous slaves. So that, the radicals endeavored to take control in two different ways. To start with, they declined to let a large number of them as of late chosen southern congressmen sit down when Congress opened. At that point, they framed their very own joint board of trustees on reproduction. This panel - not the Senate or the House of Representatives - would settle on a significant number of the choices about recreation.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
¿Cuál era el objetivo de la iglesia y la monarquía?
ohaa [14]

Answer:

Como Soberana, la Reina tiene importantes y distintas relaciones constitucionales con las Iglesias establecidas de Inglaterra y Escocia.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What is one thing the U.S. government did to prepare to mobilize troops?
777dan777 [17]

Answer: a.  The War Production Board helped factories quickly shift from only making consumer goods to making war materials.

Explanation:

A key part of the U.S. being able to join the Second World War and contribute so effectively in the time that it did, was the War Production Board's efficiency in shifting American consumer production to war materials for use by the U.S. military and the Allies.

Thanks to the Board, companies shifted their focus from consumer goods even though there was initially some massive pushback. Following a national campaign, opposition subsided and the U.S. was able to pump out so much war material that the war would not have been won without.

4 0
3 years ago
What does it mean that the rights in the First Amendment are not absolute?
suter [353]

Answer:

The Government Can restrict people's rights if the exercise of them is harming someone else

Explanation:

the First Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech but that doesn't mean that people won't be offended by your words or that the first amendment protects the right to say anything anywhere or anytime without repercussions

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • (02.02 LC)Which of the following leaders used the Church to unify German kingdoms under his own power? Charlemagne Henry III Clo
    5·2 answers
  • Explain how Muhammad<br> spread his ideas of Islam to<br> the people living around him<br> in mecca.
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a branch of islam
    9·2 answers
  • Did Erasmus of Rotterdam make the church pay for their sins?
    10·1 answer
  • Whose actions does jefferson criticize most harshly in the document?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the Interstate Commerce Act authorized to regulate?
    11·2 answers
  • If you're good at social studies answer this please​
    11·1 answer
  • After the Civil War, farmers’ debt a decreased as a result of lower transportation costs. b decreased as a result of their stron
    9·1 answer
  • In the mid-1960s, many public places were still segregated by race. There were “whites only” water fountains and restrooms, and
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement is more true
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!