1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
polet [3.4K]
3 years ago
14

Why did Leonard believe annexing the Philippines would be advantageous?

History
1 answer:
andrey2020 [161]3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:

Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.

You might be interested in
Which major event occurred in the Third Punic War? ( 4 points)
Serggg [28]
One major event that occurred in the Third Punic War was that "<span>Roman captured and defeated of Carthage," since this ultimately led to the Carthage Empire in the Mediterranean. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the Berlin Conference about?
Goshia [24]

a meeting between European officials in which the distribution of Africa to European control was decided. sought to bring an end to scramble for africa. it was convened by king leopold II of belgium

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
About one __ if Canadas entire population lives in the southern lowlands of ontario
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]
Hi, what are the option choices? 
7 0
3 years ago
What was agreed to in the Treaty of Paris?
MakcuM [25]
The British recognized american independence and handed over majority of its territory east of the Mississippi River which doubled the size of what new America was becoming
4 0
3 years ago
In Kalino v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit
Elenna [48]
<h2>Through the concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>

Explanation:

In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.

Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.

This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What trait was most important to Genghis Khan when promoting generals?
    8·2 answers
  • Florence kelley helped found the national consumer league. what was the purpose of this group?
    14·2 answers
  • Each time Lewis and Clark met a new group of Native Americans, they would do several things to try to impress them. Which action
    14·1 answer
  • What two challenges did harry truman face after ww2?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the foreign policy that America followed at the beginning of World War I? What
    12·1 answer
  • A.) briefly explain the british view of how the seven years' war fundamentally changed the relationship between britain and its
    14·1 answer
  • Where did Franciscan friars live
    10·2 answers
  • A representative group at an assembly is known as a _______
    12·2 answers
  • What happened to many Cherokee people who stayed in their homeland after the deadline the American government had sex for them
    15·1 answer
  • Can you guys help me
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!