(if there aren't any options) it really just depends on your opinion, but to me it would have to be 1st person. it can also can be considered the most explanatory, but again that's only my opinion.
hope this is helpful!
A., i belive the answer should be
Yes, I think Clinton's speech was effective in showing support for the American people during this tragedy because his tone reflect the pain he felet about the feelings of the people that lost loved ones to the tragedy.
The use of language and parallelism help advance his purpose because he was able to tell about the feeling of a particular women through her letter about the death of her husband and she implores that Americans should “search for justice.” and not express anger.
<h3>What is Parallelism?</h3>
Parallelism serves as the literary term that described the similar words, phrases, sentence structure, as well as grammatical elements to emphasize similar ideas in a sentence.
Learn more about Clinton's speech at:
brainly.com/question/17647378
#SPJ1
