Answer: <u>The correct answer to this is: “[Athena and Hermes] told him which one was Medusa and that was important, for she alone of the three could be killed; the other two were immortal.” </u>
Explanation- This passage talks about the adventure of Perseus, the Greek hero, in his venture to kill the gorgon monster, Medusa
Having many friends and having few friends is obviously thinking of the amount of friends without caring much about quality. It's good to have few friends, but to have true friends.
It is always preferable to have quality friendships. Friendships built on trust, caring, love, understanding and reciprocity. A friendship between two people is between two people, never a single part. It has to have both parts. It must be a friendship strengthened in personal, intimate, and deep knowledge, to the point of this friendship overcoming difficulties, confusion, misunderstandings, quarrels, everything. This kind of friendship is built with quality. And nowadays few people possess those characteristics or are willing to acquire them. That is why friendship should never be based on quantity, on the largest number of friends. If we have few friends but friends with these characteristics, we know that they are real friends.
the answer is not c. I don't know what the answer is but it isn't c
Answer:
The prologue tells exactly what is the play is going to be about. It explains that there are two families that are feuding. The two lovers in this story are from opposing households. This raises two questions for the audience. The first is if Romeo and Juliet's deaths could have been avoided if their families had stopped their feud. The second is will their deaths show the families that there has been enough bloodshed and maybe help them find peace. The chorus begs the audience to stay and find out.
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
This is an opinion question, so I gave an explanation on both sides. Yes has 169 words, and no has 174!
YES:
Yes, I believe that TV ads promoting junk food should be banned. They actively promote unhealthy foods in a subtle way. Younger kids watching TV can see the ads with popular faces (Their favorite cartoon character, actor, or other people they look up too), then falsely assume that the junk food is going to be good for you. After they take in the mentality that junk food or unhealthy food is good for you, it will be implemented into their mindset and as they grow up- this will stay with them and promote an unhealthy eating habit. If we banned these ads, there would be advantages and disadvantages. Some advantages would be that the younger generation could possibly grow into healthy eating habits in an easier way or the ads also mess up our body’s way of understanding how hunger feels and can trigger mindless eating. Some disadvantages will be a decrease in junk food ads, less commercial jobs for actors, and a less popular demand for the foods.
<h2>
-----------------------------------</h2>
NO:
No, I do not believe TV ads for junk food should be banned. Kids from the ages 5-14 should not have to worry and be scared about their intake of food, if we do ban those ads it will promote insecurities in eating foods and not only be scared of eating the food for health reasons, but for being shamed or bullied by society. Not only are junk foods when eaten in moderation not detrimental to health in most kids, but when they're going to be taken away it will cause the kids who've become dependent on them for snacks for when they can't cook and don't have help cooking all the time to have to struggle to find something to eat. Of course, banning the ads will have pros and cons, but I truly believe that the cons outweigh the pros. The pros such as promoting a healthy eating habit, showing kids to eat healthy, etc., is VERY important, but there are many many ways we can do this without banning the ads.
<h2><u>
If I helped, please remember to thank, rate, and mark my answer as brainliest if seen fit.</u></h2>
