Student drivers are required to keep a log of their supervised driving hours. However, not all students are diligent in their record-keeping.
The transition that should be used to combine these sentences is the following one: however. This adverb is used to introduce a statement that contrasts with or appears to contradict something that has been previously said. In this case, you are saying that student drivers should keep a written record of their supervised driving hours yet you are also stating that not all of them do it thoroughly and well.
Answer:
B. Once more I looked up Women, found 'position of and turned to the pages indicated.
Explanation:
Virginia Woolf wrote her now famous extended essay "A Room of One's Own" as a speech for a women's college in the University of Cambridge. In it, she details and describes how women figures are important for the literary world and even the authorship of novels or written works but women aren't allowed or found to do so. Instead, they are 'supposed' to be confined within the four walls of the house and concentrate on maintaining the household issues. Thus, she began writing for the betterment of the women, their inclusion in the same opportunities in the writing scene. Though they may also have the same talent as that of their male counterparts, they are still denied the rights, encouragements and opportunities to be able to write on their own. So, she claims that <em>"a woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction". </em>Thus, the sentence from the essay that best supports the thought process Woolf employs in conducting her research for the essay is
Once more I looked up Women, found 'position of and turned to the pages indicated.
A: The correct answer would be based on the the student challenging the author’s claim.
The reason why is that the student refers to what the author claims and concludes, but then the student gives their perspective by writing “he fails to consider…”
The phrase “he fails to consider…” suggests that the student is challenging the author by not agreeing with the claims and conclusion.