<span>Victor - a person who defeats an enemy or opponent in a battle, game, or other competition.
</span><span>Enter - begin to be involved in.
</span>In this case (because of the 2 words), I think that the victor is the person who wins the competition while the word enter, or the phrase to enter, is probably meant as in to enter the competition. The question wasn't entirely clear but I hope I have sort of answered it. :)
Traditionally, indigenous comes from the Latin word indigena (indu/endo: in/within + gignere: to beget (to procreate or generate). But here we are simply looking at roots. The root words here are -gen (something produced, and by extension, birth) and -ous (possessing/full of), and that combination is not an option, it seems. HOWEVER, it is not uncommon for suffixes to have more than one meaning, and this is no exception. -ous also means 'having, full of, or characterized by', meaning your answer is the second option, 'the word root “gen” means “birth,” and the suffix “-ous” means “having the quality of something.”'
Answer: "Her lips were as red as roses in the spring"
Explanation:
The figurative language used in the last sentence is a <em>simile</em>
A <em>simile</em> is a comparison between two things that aren't alike--a simile <u>MUST</u> have the words "like" or "as", and this sentence uses the word "as" to compare her lips and roses.
The inference that can be made about the Cyclopes is that: They are uncivilized creatures who are potentially dangerous.
In ethics, value pluralism (also known as ethical pluralism or moral pluralism) is the idea that there are several values which may be equally correct and fundamental, and yet in conflict with each other. ... Value-pluralism is a theory in metaethics, rather than a theory of normative ethics, or a set of values in itself.
