1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
crimeas [40]
2 years ago
15

How might Cedric Rue’s sentencing have been different if he had been tried in the 1970s or the late 2010s

History
1 answer:
Inessa [10]2 years ago
3 0

Cedric Rue’s wouldn't have been sentenced to life imprisonment without any chance of parole if he had been tried in the 1970s or the late 2010s.

<h3>Who is a Juvenile?</h3>

This is an individual which is young and not yet old enough to be considered an adult.

Cedric Rue was convicted of murder, theft and arson and was sentenced to life imprisonment without any chance of parole. In the late 2010s, death penalties and imprisonment without parole was abolished for juvenile offenders which he would have benefited from as a result of it being absent in the  1970s.

Read more about Juvenile offenders here brainly.com/question/11399114

You might be interested in
What’s the difference in tax collection per person in 1880 and 2016 ?
Nitella [24]

Answer:

Individual income taxes are the single largest source of state tax revenue in the United States, accounting for 36.5 percent of all state revenue in fiscal year 2013 despite the fact that nine states forego a tax on wage and salary income. Among states (and the District of Columbia) imposing an individual income tax on wage income, the tax accounts for an average of 43.4 percent of all state collections.

Income taxes tend to be less important to local governments overall, accounting for 4.8 percent of local tax collections. Over 91 percent of all state and local income tax revenue flows to state governments. Low collections at the local level is at least partly due, however, to their lesser ubiquity. They represent 13.8 percent of collections in the thirteen states (and the District of Columbia) permitting local income taxes, ranging from de minimus collections in Oregon to 31.7 percent of local revenue in Maryland. Local governments in six states—Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania—generate more than 10 percent of their revenue from individual income taxation, as does the District of Columbia.

This week’s map shows state and local combined individual income tax collections per person in the 2013 fiscal year (latest available data). This category includes broad-based taxes on wage and salary income, as well as taxes on specific types of income, such as interest and dividend. Forty-one states have broad-based income taxes, while two (New Hampshire and Tennessee) only tax interest and dividend income. Seven states have no individual income taxes (Alaska, Florida, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming).

On average, state and local governments collected $1,070 per person from individual income taxes, but collections vary greatly across states, topping out at New York’s $2,550 per person. Connecticut comes in second at $2,172, followed by Maryland at $2,061, and Massachusetts at $1,919. Rounding out the top ten are California, Minnesota, Oregon, New Jersey, Virginia, and Illinois.

Of states with a tax on wage income, Arizona has the lowest collections per capita at $512. Mississippi ($587), Louisiana ($592), and New Mexico ($595) have roughly comparable collections. Seven states, of course, report $0 in collections, while New Hampshire and Tennessee, which only tax interest and dividend income, collect $75 and $40 per person respectively.

For an in-depth look at local income taxation, see Facts & Figures 2016—or download our new app for Android and iPhone.

Update: An earlier version of this blog post reported some state-only collection figures. The post has been updated to include combined state and local income tax collections.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What does corroborating sources allow a historian to do
Nitella [24]
It helps them determine whether an assertion made by one source is likely to be true.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the 34th President of the United States​
Lyrx [107]
Dwight D. Eisenhower
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Until the 1930s, the relationship between states like Texas and the national government would best be described as
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

The Constitution made a stronger Federal Government. It gave power to both the Federal Government and the state governments. This system is called federalism.

8 0
2 years ago
How did the chesapeake region contribute to the domestic slave trade?
Basile [38]
382838282882u3i3ueuejeiejeie
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • It is 1902 i make 45000 per year i am rich how mcuh do i owe in federal income taxes___ and where is it adress
    15·1 answer
  • At the end of reconstruction question 25 options: blacks and whites were economically equal. blacks and whites were socially equ
    9·1 answer
  • What are 5 categories of aliens according to US law
    12·1 answer
  • Which one is a secondary source about the Civil war gettysnurg address, union soldiers letters, movie about gettysburg address
    8·1 answer
  • Please HELP!!!!! The Emergence of a Counterculture
    13·1 answer
  • Athens led Greece in the Persian Wars because...<br> Brainlest who ever answers!!!!!<br>​
    9·1 answer
  • 20. (07.03 MC)
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement would a federalist most likely agree with?
    6·1 answer
  • 24. What were the two main reasons Southern Democrats agreed to allow the Republican
    9·1 answer
  • (Brainly isn’t letting me leave :/ so I am back. For now)
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!