Answer:
The answer is "The emphasis of the speech stays on Wiesel's frightening experiences as a child." Wiesel's use of the first person allows him to give a more individual view of the story as a whole. These are his knowledges, they are not neutral because this is his story. The first person is the finest way for him to deliver the things he needs to tell, and the third person would have through the story more universal not personal.
Explanation:
I know that this is none of the answer choices but I hope it helps (:
This is a hasty generalization. A hasty generalization is when an assumption of something as a whole is assumed with incomplete data. In this case, only one dog has been examined for data, and it is assumed all dogs do the same.
Answer:
Lolz, u seem to have really low grades.....try to study hard next time!!
