The quality of automation that has been shown in the question is basically cumulative.
Given that a small business specializing in computer repair implements an automated process that routes customer requests to the technician best suited for the job. Although the automated solution only reduces a few minutes of time from each request, it results in the business being able to complete several hundred more service orders per year.
We are required to tell the quality of the the automation done in the business.
Automation is basically the technique of making an apparatus, a process, or a system operate automatically.
The quality of automation shown in the question is cumulative.
Cumulative means collecting the things at a place.
Hence the quality of automation that has been shown in the question is basically cumulative.
Learn more about automation at brainly.com/question/23953526
#SPJ4
The most sensible answer is to:
A) Report his findings.
As a scientist it is his job to conduct experiments based on hypothesis or theories and from this experiments, give a detailed description, explanation, and conclusion about the experiment. This is the reason scientists and doctors write articles about their research, to make the public aware of such discoveries so that future researchers don't have to spend time valuable time and further studies can be based on such experimental report.
D) Would also be correct 'If' the scientist didn't find the expected answer to his hypothesis. This would cause the scientist to perform further experiments to find a reasonable justification and give a conclusion about it. If by the end of his studies, the research concludes that his hypothesis is incorrect, he must change his hypothesis based on scientific truth.
Both B) and C) are the least likely answers because:
B) is an immature action to take, showing the scientists lack of control. Throwing away experiment notes is not the wisest move to take as these notes not only provide valuable information about the experiment but can actually prove to be important data, that if analysed well it could show the scientist his mistake/error, a new unobseved pattern or give him a new hypothesis or idea. Thus proving to be very valuable.
C) As a scientist, it is his right to be a very genuine about his work as he is given a credibility by science. Lie is one of the greatest sin to a scientist as it causes his credibility to collapse and even lose his title as a scientist.
If I’m pretty sure I think none of these choices are correct. One politics came to rise later in American history. Second, voting rights for women came into the picture much later than early colonial times. Third, also many people during the colonial times owned slaves. So yeah.....
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I just got it right on the assignment :)
The anoles that changed were the descendants of the anoles studied four years earlier by Losos.
<h3>What is natural selection?</h3>
Natural selection is a term that refers to the evolutionary process that is based on the principle that establishes the survival of the fittest or the preponderance of the law of the strongest in a natural environment without external intervention.
In natural selection, the least fit or weakest individuals perish and their traits are not transmitted to the following generations by not reproducing.
According to the above, it can be inferred that the traits of the weak or less fit organisms studied four years earlier were not transmitted to the following generations, so the organisms studied by Losos four years later are not the same, but the offspring of The originals.
Learn more about natural selection in: brainly.com/question/9830102
#SPJ1
