Answer:
True
Explanation:
A compensated absence is employee time off with pay, which can arise in such situations as sick leave, holidays, vacations, and jury duty. To account for compensated absences, it is not necessary to separately recognize them when they are earned and used within the same period, since it is typically rolled into the general compensation expense. However, they must be charged to expense and recorded as a liability when they are earned and their use is deferred to a later period.
An employer should accrue a liability for compensated absences payable to employees for their future absences, but only if all of the following conditions are met:
• The payment obligation for future absences is based on employee services already rendered.
• The amount of the obligation can be reasonably estimated.
• Payment is probable.
• The obligation is for employee rights that vest or accumulate.
Answer:
monetarist approach
Explanation:
Monetarism relates to the school of thought that prioritizes the function of government agencies in regulating the number of resources in circulation in monetary economics. Monetarist theory argues that differences in the currency supply have significant short-term and longer-term impacts on federal output and price rates.
If a country's money supply decreases, business activity will rise, as per monetarist theory; the opposite is also correct. The monetarist philosophy is driven by a standard equation, MV= PQ, in which M will be the money supply, V is just the pace and P refers to the price of commodities, and Q is the sum of commodities.
Answer:
Survey Researcher
Public Relations Specialist
Telemarketer
Purchasing Manager
Explanation:
I just got this answer correct on my online exam.
Because sometimes the check written after the statement closing dates.
Lets say a company do a closing statement on December 26.
A check written between that date until the end of period ( December 26 - December 31), that transaction simply won't appear on the book because the company already closed the statement on December 26
The most cost effective way for John to buy a house in the suburbs is:
a.Move to the suburbs and rent a house for one year before purchasing a home.
This is to test the waters. During this time, he has to acclimatize himself into living in a new environment. He has to discover the pros and cons of living in the suburbs compared to living in the city like travel time in going to work, etc.
If after a year, he finds its more beneficial to live in the suburbs, then he can buy a house there. On the other hand, if he finds it costly to live in the suburbs compared to living in the city, he simply has to pay the necessary rent and utility bills, pack up his bags, and go home.
