1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pentagon [3]
3 years ago
11

What luxury item does lieutenant barton request that his family send him

History
1 answer:
Goryan [66]3 years ago
8 0
He requested a wagon or chariot (I believe).
You might be interested in
According to the Declaration of Independence, when should the people have the right to change their government?
Setler79 [48]
The Declaration of Independence argues that people are "<span>endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights," and that the role of government is to protect those rights. When the government stops doing so, the people have a right to change their government. 

</span>The Declaration is very specific about this: "<span>To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."</span>
8 0
3 years ago
I really really need help with this plz help me now I would appreciate it
andre [41]
I would say the answer is D.
4 0
3 years ago
The Freedmen’s Bureau was disbanded for what reason?
melamori03 [73]
The answer was wrong the real answer is southern states block funding
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the price of slaves before the cotton gin?
Whitepunk [10]
The Slaves Cost About 40,000$ Dollars Before The Cotton Gin
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The cases of Miranda v. Arizona, Mapp v. Ohio, and Gideon v. Wainwright are all related to which of the following? (5 points)
pogonyaev

Answer:

criminal investigation and court procedures

Explanation:

The common factor between the Mapp vs Ohio, Miranda vs Arizona and Gideon vs Wainwright was that they were all criminal investigation and court procedures.

In the Miranda vs Arizona case, the court ruled that the incriminating statements made by the accused were only admissible in court if the police informed the suspect of his Miranda rights first.

In the Mapp vs Ohio case, the court ruled that evidence obtained through violation of the Fourth Amendment which has to do with unlawful searches and seizures were not admissible in court.

During the Gideon vs Wainwright case, the court ruled that the states were bound by the Sixth Amendment to produce a lawyer for an accused if he cannot afford one.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • England started the Navigation Acts in the mid-1600s to
    14·2 answers
  • How did jefferson feel about political power and the common people?
    7·1 answer
  • The industrial revolution changed the way people worked by
    14·1 answer
  • What was the south's primary economic activity in 1861 was
    5·2 answers
  • Identify the principles in the Introduction of the Declaration of Independence.
    13·1 answer
  • What would the world be like if the French revolution never happened?
    7·1 answer
  • If a man could not go, he had to send either his or a substitute.
    11·1 answer
  • Please help me out with the 3 questions for civics asap
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following countries is no longer allowed to send refugees to America due to Islamic extremism?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT an economic outcome of the Civil War and Reconstruction period?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!